Pak Army Exposed Another Alleged Indian False Flag...

Summary

• The DG ISPR said that the Pakistan Army is addressing this issue.
• The DG ISPR reiterated that Pakistan, its army and its people would make no compromise on national security.
• The whole nation stands with the Pakistan Army.

AI Generated Summary

The Pakistan Army, through its media wing, rejected another alleged Indian false-flag operation in occupied Kashmir on September 29, claiming that India falsely reported killing a Lashkar-e-Taiba militant named Mohammad Asif, also referred to as Hashim Musa or Asif Fauji, and alleged that he was a Pakistani SSG handler with a service number involved in attacks. Indian reports also claimed that three associates were killed. Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations, challenged these claims by presenting Mohammad Asif alive before the media. Asif identified himself as a retired Havaldar of Pakistan Army’s Special Service Group from Pindi Gheb, Attock district, Punjab, said he retired in 2023, subsequently worked for a security company, and now lives in Rawalpindi. He said he learned through friends and social media that Indian forces had supposedly killed him, strongly denied involvement in the alleged activities, affirmed that he was alive, and said he remained willing to serve Pakistan. His appearance was used to directly challenge the claim that he had been killed and to reject allegations connecting him to militant activity or service with Pakistan’s military.

Chaudhry also accused India of sponsoring terrorist organizations operating against Pakistan, a charge India has repeatedly denied, and gave six reasons that Pakistan says explain such alleged operations: using militant activity to destabilize Pakistan; diverting international attention from conditions and Indian actions in occupied Kashmir; exploiting the large Indian security presence there to stage incidents and shape public narratives; diverting attention from India’s domestic economic, social, and political problems by creating a common external enemy; politicizing the Indian Army in ways Pakistan says undermine military professionalism; and promoting Hindutva and what Pakistan characterizes as state-sponsored terrorism through Indian political leadership. The broader allegation is that India has repeatedly blamed Pakistan for incidents without providing what Pakistan considers credible evidence, with Pulwama and Pahalgam cited as earlier examples, and that these incidents follow a recurring pattern in which Pakistan is blamed before investigations establish responsibility. Chaudhry warned that any Indian action against Pakistan would receive a strong response, stating that Pakistan has the capability to defend itself and would use that capability if necessary.

The press conference also covered other important topics. The DG ISPR spoke about Pakistan’s commitment to the Makkah Joint Defense Agreement. This is an important agreement between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. He said Pakistan remains fully committed to it. He also said that defense cooperation information under this arrangement is confidential. This is understandable. Military agreements often involve sensitive details. These details cannot be shared with the public. But the commitment is clear. The DG ISPR stated that Pakistan’s commitment to protecting Saudi Arabia and its leadership is absolute. This is a strong statement. It shows the depth of the relationship between the two countries. It shows that Pakistan takes its defense commitments seriously. This is important in a region that has many challenges. Saudi Arabia is a key ally of Pakistan. Pakistan values this relationship. It will do what it can to protect its ally. This commitment is not just about words. It is about actions. It is about the training and the cooperation that happens behind the scenes. It is about the shared security interests that bind the two nations together. The DG ISPR made it clear that this relationship is strong and will remain strong. He also spoke about domestic matters. He said that relations between the federal government and the provinces are the federal government’s responsibility. This is an important clarification. It means the army does not interfere in these matters. The army has no role in politics. This is a point that is often misunderstood. The DG ISPR emphasized that the armed forces operate under Pakistan’s Constitution and state orders. They are not a political entity. They are a professional force. Their job is to defend the country. Their job is not to run the government. This separation of roles is important. It is important for democracy. It is important for the stability of the country. The DG ISPR reiterated this point clearly. He left no room for ambiguity. The army follows the Constitution. It follows the orders of the state. It does not involve itself in political disputes. This is the correct position for any professional army. It is the position that the Pakistan Army maintains. It is a position that deserves respect and understanding.