The Supreme Court on Friday (October 9, 2026) declined to intervene in the Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker’s decision to close disqualification proceedings against a group of All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) legislators who had supported C. Joseph Vijay’s Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK)-led government during the trust vote in May. The court observed that the Speaker’s decision could not be challenged by an “interloper”.
A Bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana dismissed a plea filed by advocate P.V. Selvakumar, while observing that the sanctity of the constitutional mandate under the Tenth Schedule, which contains the anti-defection law, must be preserved.
“We are fully with you that sanctity of constitutional mandate must be preserved. But we must understand workings of a democratic system,” the Bench said.
Mr. Selvakumar approached the Supreme Court after the Madras High Court rejected his petition challenging the Speaker’s June 9 decision to drop the disqualification proceedings against the AIADMK legislators.
Party leader’s letter
The Speaker had acted on a May 27 letter from the party’s general secretary seeking withdrawal of the proceedings. The High Court had held that Mr. Selvakumar, being a third party to the dispute, had no locus standi to interfere in the internal affairs of the AIADMK.




Comments
0 commentsNo comments yet — be the first.