International

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Latest News: Former Duke of York Wins High Court Battle as Judge Rules Police Used an ‘Unlawful’ Legal Provision for Epstein Investigation Raids

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Latest News: Former Duke of York Wins High Court Battle as Judge Rules Police Used an ‘Unlawful’ Legal Provision for Epstein Investigation Raids
Photo credit: Sunday Guardian
Advertisement

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Latest News: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has secured a significant legal victory against Thames Valley Police, but the High Court ruling does not end the criminal investigation linked to his alleged dealings with Jeffrey Epstein. The court found that the warrants used to search properties connected to the former prince were obtained under the wrong legal provision.

The ruling by Mr Justice Hilliard on Thursday, October 8, came after Mountbatten-Windsor challenged the legality of the searches carried out at properties linked to him in Sandringham and Windsor. Thames Valley Police accepted that the wrong statutory route had been used to obtain the warrants, leading the court to quash them.

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Latest News: Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor Wins High Court Challenge Against Police Warrants

The legal dispute centres on search warrants issued by the Central Criminal Court on February 18. Officers used the warrants to search properties associated with Mountbatten-Windsor as part of an investigation into allegations that he shared confidential information with Epstein while working as the UK’s trade envoy.

Advertisement

You Might Be Interested In

The High Court found that the warrants did not meet the legal requirements under the section of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 used by police Thames Valley Police conceded the error, and Hilliard subsequently ruled that the warrants were unlawful.

Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Latest News: Why Were the Search Warrants Ruled Unlawful?

The case focused on whether police had used the correct part of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 when seeking permission to search the properties. Hilliard found that Section 8 was not the appropriate provision because the warrant applications anticipated that officers could encounter legally privileged documents and other material subject to special protections.

Advertisement
Originally published by Sunday Guardian on Oct 8, 2026 Read the full article at sundayguardianlive.com
Read original
About this page. Sisnoo is an aggregator. This article was imported from a publisher feed and may have been reformatted. Copyright remains with the original publisher, and the headline, image and any quoted text are used for attribution and indexing purposes. Source links are preserved on every item in the archive.
Share

Comments

0 comments

No comments yet — be the first.

Advertisement

More from Sunday Guardian

View source

Related