Strong Government or Strong State?

The phrase “strong government” is heard frequently in today’s political debate. But my generation must ask a more fundamental question: Do we really need a strong government, or do we need a strong state? These are not the same thing. The ability of an individual to make decisions quickly, direct state mechanisms according to personal preferences, or suppress criticism and opposition does not, by itself, constitute strong governance.

In a democracy, government power should not be used to weaken citizens; it should be used to strengthen institutions and make the state more capable. A strong government does not mean powerless citizens, a silent Parliament, or public institutions operating according to the wishes of those in power. Rather, strong government means effective institutions, capable administration, accountable leadership, independent public bodies, and citizens who have confidence in the state.

The central spirit of the Gen Z movement must also be understood in this context. The movement was not simply about changing one government. It raised deeper questions about our system of governance and political culture. The demand was not for politics centered on individuals, but for a democracy grounded in strong institutions. It was about creating a society in which citizens could question the state without fear and demand accountability from those who exercise public power.

The aspiration of my generation is that institutions must be greater than individuals, the Constitution greater than political power, the law greater than personal commands, and the sovereign rights of citizens greater than the interests of any government.

In this context, the role of Parliament is critically important. Parliament should never be reduced to a chorus supporting the government of the day. When a political party holds an overwhelming parliamentary majority and its own lawmakers become unwilling or unable to question government decisions, parliamentary oversight can be weakened. Parliament is the institution that represents the people. It must scrutinize government decisions, debate public policy, oversee the executive, and ensure that the government remains accountable to the Constitution, the law, and the people.

Questioning the government and criticizing wrongdoing are not anti-government actions. On the contrary, scrutiny, criticism, and oversight are essential to responsible democratic governance. A government that cannot tolerate questions may appear powerful, but a government that can listen to criticism, answer legitimate questions, and accept accountability demonstrates institutional strength.

We must also understand the difference between the state and the government. Governments come and go. Prime ministers change. Political parties and coalitions change. State institutions, however, are designed to endure. The Constitution remains the fundamental legal framework, laws continue to govern public affairs, and citizens’ rights remain protected regardless of which party is in power.